Praxeology Buku Teks Matematika SMA

SPESIFIKASI BUKU

Harga                    : Rp 65.000

Ukuran                  : 14,8 cm x 21 cm 

Jumlah Halaman : 156 hal

Ketebalan Buku  : 1  cm

ISBN                       : On Proses

Deskripsi Buku   : Buku ini hadir sebagai salah satu kontribusi penulis dalam mengkaji dan mengembangkan pendekatan pembelajaran matematika yang lebih seimbang, antara aspek prosedural yang menekankan keterampilan teknis dengan aspek konseptual yang mengedepankan pemahaman mendalam. Kajian praxeology dalam buku ini berangkat dari kesadaran bahwa buku teks, sebagai salah satu sumber utama dalam pembelajaran matematika di sekolah, memiliki peran strategis dalam membentuk cara berpikir siswa. Oleh karena itu, analisis terhadap struktur tugas, teknik, teknologi, serta teori yang terkandung dalam buku teks matematika menjadi penting untuk memastikan kesesuaian dengan tujuan pembelajaran yang diharapkan. Kerangka Documentational Approach to Didactics (DAD) dipilih sebagai landasan dalam analisis ini, karena memberikan perspektif komprehensif tentang bagaimana guru dan siswa memanfaatkan sumber belajar, serta bagaimana buku teks dapat dijadikan dokumen pedagogis yang memfasilitasi keseimbangan antara keterampilan prosedural dan pemahaman konseptual. Melalui pembahasan khusus pada materi trigonometri, buku ini diharapkan dapat memberikan gambaran nyata mengenai penerapan teori DAD dalam konteks pendidikan matematika di tingkat SMA. Semoga buku ini dapat memberikan manfaat, khususnya bagi pendidik, calon guru, peneliti, serta pemerhati pendidikan matematika, dalam mengembangkan strategi pembelajaran yang lebih bermakna. Akhir kata, penulis mengucapkan terima kasih kepada semua pihak yang telah memberikan dukungan, bimbingan, dan inspirasi sehingga buku ini dapat terselesaikan. Semoga buku ini dapat menjadi salah satu referensi penting dalam upaya meningkatkan kualitas pembelajaran matematika di Indonesia.

REFERENSI 

Adhikari, T. N., & Subedi, A. (2021). Difficulties of Grade X students in learning trigonometry. Siddhajyoti Interdisciplinary Journal, 2(01), 90–99. https://doi.org/10.3126/sij.v2i01.39243

Agustito, D., Kuncoro, K. S., Kusumaningrum, B., & Wijayanti, D. (2025). Praxeological analysis of linear algebra content presentation: A case study of Indonesian mathematics textbooks. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(6), em2648. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16508

Ahl, L. M., Helenius, O., & Koljonen, T. (2022). Gauging fidelity to an implemented teaching model through the lens of the documentational approach to didactics. Implementation and Replication Studies in Mathematics Education, 2(1), 45–75. https://doi.org/10.1163/26670127-bja10003

Alagumalai, S., & Buchdahl, N. (2021). PISA 2012: Examining the influence of prior knowledge, time-on-task, school-level effects on achievements in mathematical literacy processes – Interpret, employ and formulate. Australian Journal of Education, 65(2), 173–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/00049441211031674

Azuhra, N., Syahputri, A., Sagala, C. R., Mondol, M. R., & Sakinah, N. (2025). Analisis potensi miskonsepsi dalam penyajian materi pertidaksamaan linier satu variabel pada buku teks matematika SMP. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 10(3), 230–239. https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i03.33108

Basyal, D., Jones, D. L., & Thapa, M. (2023). Cognitive demand of mathematics tasks in Nepali middle school mathematics textbooks. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(3), 863–879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10269-3

Bosch, M., Chevallard, Y., García, F. J., & Monaghan, J. (2020). Working with the anthropological theory of the didactic in mathematics education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429198168

Burns, M. K., Walick, C., Simonson, G. R., Dominguez, L., Harelstad, L., Kincaid, A., & Nelson, G. S. (2015). Using a conceptual understanding and procedural fluency heuristic to target math interventions with students in early elementary. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 30(2), 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12056

Cavey, L. O., & Berenson, S. B. (2005). Learning to teach high school mathematics: Patterns of growth in understanding right triangle trigonometry during lesson plan study. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24(2), 171–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2005.03.001

Cetin, O. F. (2015). Students’ perceptions and development of conceptual understanding regarding trigonometry and trigonometric function. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(3), 338–350. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2014.2017

Chevallard, Y. (2019). Introducing the anthropological theory of the didactic: An attempt at a principled approach. Hiroshima Journal of Mathematics Education, 12, 71–114. https://doi.org/10.24529/hjme.1205

Chevallard, Y., Barquero, B., Bosch, M., & Florensa, I. (Eds.). (2022). Advances in the anthropological theory of the didactic. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76791-4

Chevallard, Y., Bosch, M., & Kim, S. (2015, February). What is a theory according to the anthropological theory of the didactic? In CERME 9 – Ninth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 2614–2620). https://hal.science/hal-01289424

Corral, M. (2009). Trigonometry. https://mecmath.net/trig/Trigonometry.pdf

Darussalam, B. (2015). Investigating students’ conceptual knowledge and procedural skills in the learning of college-level trigonometry. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 9(11), 952–962. https://doi.org/10.19026/rjaset.9.2588

Dougherty, B., Bryant, D. P., Bryant, B. R., & Shin, M. (2016). Helping students with mathematics difficulties understand ratios and proportions. Teaching Exceptional Children, 49(2), 96–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059916674897

Elisya, N., Afgani Dahlan, J., & Yulianti, K. (2024). Epistemological obstacles of secondary school students in solving PISA-standard mathematical literacy problems related to functions. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 25(4), 1771–1786. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v25i4.pp1771-1786

Engler, S., & Stausberg, M. (2021). The Routledge handbook of research methods in the study of religion. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003222491

Fajriadi, D., Fatimah, S., & Suryadi, D. (2025). Analisis praksiologis buku teks matematika: Mengenalkan materi bangun ruang sisi datar. Teorema: Teori dan Riset Matematika, 10(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.25157/teorema.v10i1.17943

Fardian, D., Suryadi, D., & Prabawanto, S. (2025). A praxeological analysis of linear equations in Indonesian mathematics textbooks: Focusing on systemic and epistemic aspect. Journal on Mathematics Education, 16(1), 225–254. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v16i1.pp225-254

Fattah, G. F., Lestari, W., & Zairozie, A. Z. (2025). Enhancing students’ spatial ability and mathematical resilience in trigonometry through the realistic mathematics education (RME) approach with clinometer media. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (JPM), 11(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.33474/jpm.v11i1.23249

Fererde, A., Mihrka, A., Ayele, M., & Arara, A. (2024). Enhancing students’ conceptual understanding and problem-solving skills in learning trigonometry through contextual-based mathematical modeling instruction. International Journal of Secondary Education, 12(4), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsedu.20241204.15

Fitriasari, P., Suhendra, S., Suryadi, D., & Nurlaelah, E. (2025). Textbook analysis of integers content using the praxeology framework. Jurnal Elemen, 11(3), 577–596. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v11i3.29859

Gelfand, I. M., & Saul, M. (2001). Trigonometry. Birkhäuser Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0149-6